>
6.5x55 Swedish vs. 6.5 Creedmoor: The New 6.5mm Hotness
Best 7mm PRC Ammo: Hunting and Long-Distance Target Shooting
Christmas Truce of 1914, World War I - For Sharing, For Peace
EngineAI T800: Born to Disrupt! #EngineAI #robotics #newtechnology #newproduct
This Silicon Anode Breakthrough Could Mark A Turning Point For EV Batteries [Update]
Travel gadget promises to dry and iron your clothes – totally hands-free
Perfect Aircrete, Kitchen Ingredients.
Futuristic pixel-raising display lets you feel what's onscreen
Cutting-Edge Facility Generates Pure Water and Hydrogen Fuel from Seawater for Mere Pennies
This tiny dev board is packed with features for ambitious makers
Scientists Discover Gel to Regrow Tooth Enamel
Vitamin C and Dandelion Root Killing Cancer Cells -- as Former CDC Director Calls for COVID-19...
Galactic Brain: US firm plans space-based data centers, power grid to challenge China

John Taylor didn't like the idea of being forced by the Federal Aviation Administration to register his drones. The requirement was "authoritarian," the Maryland attorney said, and wouldn't deter reckless fliers.
So the aviation law novice – he works in insurance – took the feds to court. And won.
A lawsuit by John Taylor, seen with one of his drones, upended a national registration system that was supposed to balance public safety and the rights of the growing legions of amateur drone pilots. Washington Post/ Katherine Frey
A federal appeals court this month struck down a 2015 FAA rule that compelled owners of drones used for recreation to register them.
Now Taylor's unexpected success has upended a system meant to balance public safety and the rights of hobbyists who have purchased millions of drones.
While he has been treated as a conquering hero by many recreational drone pilots – the editor of sUAS News wrote that Taylor "should never need to buy a beer at a model aircraft event again!" – others fear his win could be a Pyrrhic victory for the broader world of unmanned aircraft.