>
Who Was The Biggest Antisemite In 2025?
Putin residence attack jeopardizes US security guarantees
NY Times Expose: CIA Fights Russia – Trump's Peace Deal Runs on Illusion
Fearless Predictions, Ten Key Events to Expect in 2026
Laser weapons go mobile on US Army small vehicles
EngineAI T800: Born to Disrupt! #EngineAI #robotics #newtechnology #newproduct
This Silicon Anode Breakthrough Could Mark A Turning Point For EV Batteries [Update]
Travel gadget promises to dry and iron your clothes – totally hands-free
Perfect Aircrete, Kitchen Ingredients.
Futuristic pixel-raising display lets you feel what's onscreen
Cutting-Edge Facility Generates Pure Water and Hydrogen Fuel from Seawater for Mere Pennies
This tiny dev board is packed with features for ambitious makers
Scientists Discover Gel to Regrow Tooth Enamel
Vitamin C and Dandelion Root Killing Cancer Cells -- as Former CDC Director Calls for COVID-19...

If that still sounds backwards to you, please stay with me. I'll begin making sense of it by explaining how this post came together:
Last week I published an article that I knew would not be appreciated in certain circles. But for me, their approval or disapproval didn't really matter, because I posted it directly to the Internet, not to some intermediate service.
Right away, I got a comment from someone who reported that, "I got banned on Reddit for saying this." I had no doubt that the report was true, but when I thought of something to say in reply, all that lept to mind were things like, "Sorry to hear" and "Glad you spoke the truth anyway." I felt that there was more to be said, but I wasn't sure what.
And then I remembered the old days, as the Internet was first spreading across the world, to the horror of entrenched interests like the New York Times. It was an intoxicating time. There were no gatekeepers and interesting people were popping up on every side. Anyone could say whatever was on their mind. Not all of it was great, but it was free, open, unrestricted speech and thought. The overlords had no levers to grab and the future opened up wide.
In those days, getting onto the Internet was almost like walking out of a prison; it had an odd, subversive feel to it.
Those of you who were too young to experience this, please try to ask someone who was there.
Since then, the Internet has been overtaken by hucksters, techno-sociopaths, and mercenaries who saw it only as a something to exploit.
Rather than going through details on the process, I'll simply say that intel agencies built mass surveillance systems, until Ferengi types with addictive services started feeding them deep surveillance on billions of people at once.
Over the past fifteen years, the vast majority of Internet traffic has been herded into Google and Facebook, where people were very carefully monitored and controlled.
And so it's no surprise that we've seen massive censorship and banning: That was possible only because these holding pens aren't actually the Internet: they are merely attached to the Internet.
That, of course, is what I ended up responding: Reddit is not the Internet; it's a holding pen attached to the Internet.
The Internet was a wide-open, decentralized and free place, with no gatekeepers and no punishers; nor did it have almost any type of hierarchy: everyone was on the same level.
The Internet, in those early days, was the embodiment of actual freedom. It was a realm of the mind, not a realm of free accounts.