The good news is "troop deployment is UP TO THE UNITED STATES."

This being "good news" in the same way that being told you have cancer – but it hasn't spread yet – is "good news."

If you voted for Trump, did you vote to send American troops to  . . .  Keeeeeeeeeeeeev? That would be bad enough, given that sending American troops (and American tax dollars) to these shithole countries where no American interest are involved – as opposed to the interests of the people who control the government that rules America – is always a bad idea for Americans, who get nothing in return except slain and crippled Americans and higher taxes as well as the well-earned contempt of the people who live in the countries curb-stomped by American troops.

It is much worse, of course, as regards Keeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeev – because that means Russia, which is not a shithole country. It is a country that has (according to most estimates) about 5,000 nuclear warheads and the means to deliver them anywhere. London, for instance.

Or Washington, DC.

Not that it would be such a bad thing – as such. If only it were just that nest of corruption. Unfortunately, it would not be contained to just a therapeutic fusion cleansing. There is no plausible scenario for a controlled nuclear conflict because once one goes off, the response will be to let another one off and then another in response to that one. Indeed, unless the "strategic doctrine" of the Cold War has changed – and there are no indications it has changed – once one side detects and confirms a launch by the other side, a massive response is triggered – because if not, then within half an hour, it could be game over for the side that holds back. If London is turned to glass, will the Starmer regime not turn Moscow to glass? Once the nukes start flying in Europe, the idea that it will be contained to Europe is an idea that only a very stupid or very delusional person could take seriously.

And for what? Keeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeev?

Seriously?

Of course not. Meaning it isn't really that they are trying to trigger a war with Russia – even at the risk of triggering a nuclear war. It is that they – Starmer and the other Eurotrash leaders who've flooded Europe with hordes of non-Europeans – need a war to deal with the internal problems they've created by flooding Europe with hordes of non-Europeans. Britain teeters on the verge of civil war because Britons tire of being replaced. They wax restless – because they correctly sense they face an existential threat. They are not wrong. It is so bad that the British government – which is an occupying government at this point – is rounding up people for daring to say anything other than affirmative about their replacement. The same situation in Germany and other European countries that were European as recently as 20 years ago.