>
China's visa-free boom is rewriting inbound tourism
A New Kind Of Hybrid Is Coming. See The 9 Extended-Range EVs Hitting America Soon
America's Public Schools Have an Empty-Desk Problem
Saudi, Turkey, Pakistan agree to Riyadh secretariat under defence pact;
Here's What to Expect as Air Taxis Actually Begin to Take Off
'Wood Foam' Startup Uses Logging Waste as Substitute for Plastic, Producing 400 Pounds Daily
How a Group of Young Men in 1933 Solved a Water Crisis in The Desert -- And Nobody Knows About It
This American Battery Could Break China's Grip On The EV Supply Chain
Tesla's Cybercab Launch Is Next Week. Here's What Tesla Still Needs To Prove
800-passenger commercial plane boldly reinvents how we will fly
Does Ultra-Fast Charging Ruin An EV Battery? BYD Did It 350 Times In 9 Days To Find Out
Singapore is experimenting with biological computing using living human neurons...
It's Happening - Europe is Building an Impossible Fusion Reactor
Portable 1MW Kaleidos Microreactor Secures Critical Nuclear Fuel Deal Through 2030s

On the heels of the Leah File's expose of Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent's major skill-set, this time targeting us, we find a new 25-year "US government agreement" to take ownership of 65% of Venezuelan oil reserves, wherefrom Washington sends back to the government of Venezuela $19 from each barrel produced and sold.
We don't know if the $19 is a proportional share based on barrel pricing over time, or a flat fee. We do know, much as all mortgage holders realize, paying for a real asset over time with continually devalued dollars can be a smart use of paper.
Plunder, pillage and piracy are popular in Washington, as this latest Trump post illustrates. Donald Trump and Scott Bessent understand debt and currency destruction extremely well, even if they cannot define the word "gift."
Immediately upon the kidnapping of Mr. and Mrs. Maduro and the "new" US relationship with Delcy Rodriguez, Trump issued Executive Order 14373 "Safeguarding Venezuelan Oil Revenue For The Good Of The American And Venezuelan People." This order starts with the declaration of a "national emergency" to "threat of attachment or imposition of judicial process" on the Venezuelan funds held in the US Foreign Government Deposit Funds account to be "a threat to the United States."
This executive order is similar to the George W. Bush EO 13303 of May 22, 2003. That order also declares a national emergency, and establishes the Iraq Development Fund, directing all Iraqi oil revenues into a USA Federal Bank account in NYC. This order meshes nicely with the March 20, 2003 EO whereby the US outlines the policy of "Confiscating and Vesting Certain Iraqi Property."
I asked Grok to compare these two orders, one confiscating Iraq oil, the other setting the stage for the current "arrangement" regarding Venezuelan oil. Grok determined that they are close cousins, with the bottom line:
[both establish an] IEEPA emergency used to put oil revenue beyond the reach of judgment creditors so the executive branch can use that revenue for a foreign-policy project. The Iraq order is a wide asset shield around a reconstruction fund and Iraqi oil in U.S. reach, backed by UN authority and older wartime sanctions. The Venezuela order is a narrow account shield around money already in Treasury's hands, with extra findings about ownership, custody, non-commercial use, and non-waiver of immunity, plus State Department control over disbursement and an express override of prior Venezuela sanctions orders.
Trump is presenting this Venezuelan oil arrangement as US ownership of Venezuelan oil reserves, much as he does with the fundamental booty Trump still hopes to extract from Iran. Trump fantasizes about owning the Strait of Hormuz and extracting both Iranian oil as his property, and charging many times more fees and profits than the Persian Gulf Strait Authority could ever envision. He has cartoonishly claimed to own not only the Strait and Venezuela, but Canada and Greenland. Trump recently directed the "Department of Justice" to legalize physical confiscation of energy and other "US forbidden" shipments directly from ships on the high seas, requiring a novel interpretation of "Prize Law."
Americans of various political persuasions alternatively ridicule and praise Trump in his gleeful promotion of an America that most of us sense is in slow motion collapse. Beyond the entertainment factor, we all see an explosion in domestic unconstitutionality and a cold, clear agenda of direct theft via military-backed or "legalized" plunder, and the pursuit of dollar denomination everywhere.
The US unilaterally issues trade, travel or transport sanctions and prohibitions, direct and indirect, primary and secondary. Then, in the name of enforcing its own Washington, DC mandates, the US government via its military and policing forces, including the State Department. Treasury and the FBI, unilaterally takes what it wants. Many Americans have no problem with this utilization of "national power." But when other countries do the same, or more commonly, respond to these American presumptions, we whine, cry, scream and beat our chests in rage as if some major shared value system has been violated.